What is LEAP?

We are activists, social entrepreneurs, foundation staff, and philanthropists working towards systemic change in philanthropy.

Our goal is to contribute to a philanthropic sector that shares power, to support systems transformation in a radically transparent way.


A world where economic and political systems are centred on ecological and social wellbeing care and repair. A world where philanthropy is no longer needed.


Leap is working to help traditional philanthropy become obsolete, and supports the rise of the practices and experiments that foster new systems.


Experiments are Leap’s method of disruption and creation in philanthropy. We seek out important projects that need, but do not receive, funding, and help connect them with resources, people and institutions.

Leap challenges the way wealth is created in the first place, as a crucial part of our systemic stance. We are convinced that much of philanthropy is a form of influence structurally based on the same power imbalances and modes of extraction that create the very problems that philanthropy claims to solve.

But we also believe that resources, including resources created in the “wrong way”, should now contribute towards the solutions, while being explicitly open about the histories of this wealth. Leap is responsible for decision making around which funds and resources Leap will accept.

What's wrong with philanthropy?

Philanthropy works in silos to address the symptoms of systemic crises. Philanthropy programs rarely reflect the complexity of the interconnected crises we are facing. The focus on short-term success and projects with clearly defined outcomes prevents long-term investment in actors, ecosystems and processes that have the potential to contribute to systems transformation.

The systems set up by philanthropy often replicate the same extractive practices they intend to change. Philanthropy centralises power and reproduces societal injustices like racism and inequality. Decisions about funding are largely made by individuals or small groups of privileged people who are usually far removed from the realities that the funding will influence. Philanthropic actors do not trust their recipients to make decisions about where funding should go.

The philanthropic sector is more concerned with its reputation than with making its processes transparent. Foundations rarely report where their money goes, who makes the decisions, or what the origin of their wealth is. Accountability usually only is directed downwards to the recipients of funding

What does Leap work towards?

We focus on systems transformation. This means supporting actors and ecosystems - not projects - that are working to tackle the systemic root causes of social problems. It means unrestricted financial support without administrative hurdles. We select experiments that are addressing the root causes of extractive systems and structural injustice.

We share power through real participation. This means trusting in those doing the work to know what is needed, where and when. It means participation in strategic decisions of how funding is allocated. It means mutual feedback and trust to evolve all the organisations in the process.

We believe that authenticity, transparency and the willingness to take risks are more important than reputation management. For us, making mistakes and failing is a welcome, expected part of growing.  We make transparent where philanthropic money comes from and where it goes. 


Leap’s Radical Care Experiment

Blog (By Ann Marie Utratel) In the realm of philanthropy and activism, a transformative experiment is underway, aiming to redefine the essence of care in the pursuit of systemic change. Spearheaded by the...

Read More

My Shitty Experiences with Donors

A collection of jaw dropping funding practices and of what you should not do as a donor (By Flaviano Bianchini) After almost 20 years of working as an activist in the field, and...

Read More